The article originally appears in The Measurement Advisor. This post discusses lateral inhibition, a neural process that helps our senses handle too much information. When a similar process occurs in our brains, it manifests as a hunger for shiny new things. Thus we fall prey to the temptations of clickbait and fake news. If you … Continue reading How Our Senses React to Too Much Data
- Home
- How Our Senses React to Too Much Data
All posts by Bill Paarlberg
This post originally appeared in The Measurement Advisor. Social science’s Replicability Crisis demonstrates that numerous problems can affect the ability of research to reach reliable conclusions. Brown and Heathers’ GRIM test is a new and elegant method to check research for certain data problems. You use public relations research every day. You read about it, … Continue reading The GRIM Test: An Easy Way to Check Your Data Is Not Faulty →
This is the fourth in a series of IPR blog posts on the 2013 European Communication Monitor (ECM). See the first post in this series for a review of the survey’s overall demographics, methodology, and results. The second post dealt with results concerning strategic issues and influence. The third post reviewed salaries and status. Suppose you … Continue reading The European Communication Monitor 2013: The influence of professional organizations and what the data means for IPR →
This is the third in a series of IPR blog posts summarizing the results of the 2013 European Communication Monitor (ECM). The ECM is an annual longitudinal trans-national survey of European communications professionals, first carried out in 2007. It describes itself as, “the largest survey on strategic communication, corporate communications, communication management, and public relations … Continue reading The European Communication Monitor 2013 (Part 3): Salaries and Status →
First published in The Measurement Standard, this is an interview by Editor Bill Paarlberg with David Geddes, Managing Director of Geddes Analytics and past Chair of the IPR Measurement Commission of the Institute for Public Relations. He is Chair of the Coalition for Public Relations Research Standards, the group of industry leaders that have developed standards … Continue reading Measurement Standards: Present, Future and Meaning →
This is the second in a series of IPR blog posts on the 2013 European Communication Monitor (ECM), an annual longitudinal trans-national survey of European communications professionals. The original post reviewed the overall demographics, methodology and results of the 2013 survey, which received 2,710 responses from 43 countries. It’s clear strategic public relations is an … Continue reading The European Communication Monitor2013 (Part 2): Strategic Issues and Influence →
The European Communication Monitor (ECM) is an annual longitudinal trans-national survey of European communications professionals, first carried out in 2007. It describes itself as, “the largest survey on strategic communication, corporate communications, communication management, and public relations worldwide.” The 2013 version asked 39 questions and received 2,710 responses from 43 countries. This article is the … Continue reading European Communication Monitor 2013 (Part I) →